Kadence Blocks — Page Builder Toolkit for Gutenberg Editor vs Page Builder by SiteOrigin (2026): PluginCheck
Quick Verdict
Pick Kadence Blocks if you want to stay inside the Gutenberg editor, get a larger user base (600,000 installs), and benefit from stronger support resolution (61.1%). Pick Page Builder by SiteOrigin if you want a mature, dedicated drag and drop interface backed by far more user ratings (1,004) and a long track record.
Both Kadence Blocks and Page Builder by SiteOrigin tackle the same core problem: helping WordPress users build polished, responsive page layouts without writing custom code. Each takes a different route to get there, one extending the native Gutenberg editor and the other providing a standalone drag and drop builder. Your choice depends largely on whether you prefer working inside Gutenberg or prefer a dedicated builder interface.
Kadence Blocks — Page Builder Toolkit for Gutenberg Editor
20+ Gutenberg Blocks with endless options, enabling top-notch efficiency for high-performance dynamic website creation.
- Active installs 600k+
- Rating 4.8/5 (331)
- Last updated Jun 29, 2026
- Support resolved 61%
- Tested to WP 7.0
- Requires PHP 7.4
Page Builder by SiteOrigin
Build responsive page layouts using the widgets you know and love using this simple drag and drop page builder.
- Active installs 400k+
- Rating 4.8/5 (1,004)
- Last updated Jul 1, 2026
- Support resolved 33%
- Tested to WP 7.0
- Requires PHP 7.0.0
Where Kadence Blocks — Page Builder Toolkit for Gutenberg Editor Wins
Popularity
Kadence Blocks has 600,000 active installs compared to SiteOrigin's 400,000, giving it broader real world usage. It also scores higher on the popularity metric at 86 vs 84.
Support resolution
Kadence resolves 61.1% of support threads, nearly double SiteOrigin's 33.3%. This translates to a 61/15 support score versus 50/15 for SiteOrigin.
Active development
Both plugins are actively maintained with 100/25 maintenance scores, but Kadence concentrates its depth inside the modern Gutenberg workflow where most WordPress users already are.
Where Page Builder by SiteOrigin Wins
User feedback volume
SiteOrigin has 1,004 ratings compared to Kadence's 331, offering a much larger pool of feedback to judge long term reliability. It sustains the same 96/100 rating despite this tougher sample size.
Builder paradigm
SiteOrigin delivers a standalone drag and drop page builder interface rather than scattering controls across Gutenberg blocks. Users who prefer classic page builder workflows tend to find it more intuitive.
Compatibility stability
Both score a perfect 100/15 on compatibility, but SiteOrigin's widget based approach integrates with thousands of existing WordPress widgets without forcing block conversions.
Score-by-Score Comparison
Kadence leads with 600,000 installs versus 400,000 and scores 86/30 versus 84/30. Both are clearly mainstream choices, but Kadence has the larger footprint.
Both plugins score a perfect 100/25 on maintenance, reflecting consistent, recent updates from each team. There is no meaningful maintenance advantage on either side.
Both maintain an identical 96/15 rating score, though SiteOrigin's 1,004 ratings provide a much larger and more statistically meaningful sample than Kadence's 331.
Kadence resolves 61.1% of support threads and scores 61/15, well ahead of SiteOrigin at 33.3% and 50/15. If post purchase support matters to you, Kadence wins this round clearly.
Both score 100/15 on compatibility, indicating strong performance across current WordPress versions with no reported issues. Either plugin will work well with a modern WordPress setup.
The Bottom Line
For most users building a new WordPress site today, Kadence Blocks is the stronger pick: it has the higher quality score (89.44 vs 86.99), 50% more active installs, and substantially better support resolution at 61.1% versus 33.3%. Its Gutenberg native approach also matches where WordPress is heading editorially. SiteOrigin remains a solid choice for users who specifically want a traditional drag and drop builder, and its 1,004 ratings make it arguably the most battle tested option in the comparison. If you value ongoing help and a modern workflow, go Kadence.