Cyr-To-Lat vs Loco Translate (2026): PluginCheck
Quick Verdict
Pick Cyr-To-Lat if your site uses Cyrillic, Greek, or other non-Latin scripts and you need clean, readable URLs out of the box. Pick Loco Translate if you localize themes or plugins into one or more languages and want to edit PO files without leaving wp-admin.
These two plugins solve fundamentally different problems, so the choice really comes down to what you need on your WordPress site. Cyr-To-Lat handles URL slug transliteration for non-Latin scripts, while Loco Translate manages plugin and theme translations directly in the browser. Comparing them side by side is useful because both sit near the top of the utility plugin category and both ship with high quality scores.
- Active installs 300k+
- Rating 4.7/5 (98)
- Last updated May 24, 2026
- Support resolved 89%
- Tested to WP 7.0
- Requires PHP 7.4
Loco Translate
Translate WordPress plugins and themes directly in your browser. Versatile PO file editor with integrated AI translation providers.
- Active installs 1M+
- Rating 4.8/5 (450)
- Last updated Jul 13, 2026
- Support resolved 50%
- Tested to WP 7.0.1
- Requires PHP 7.4
Where Cyr-To-Lat Wins
Higher support resolution
Cyr-To-Lat resolves 88.9% of support threads, nearly double Loco Translate's 50.0% rate, meaning you're far more likely to get a useful answer when something breaks.
More focused scope
With 300,000 active installs and 98 ratings averaging 94/100, Cyr-To-Lat is a tight, single-purpose tool that has been refined since its last update on May 24, 2026.
Where Loco Translate Wins
Much larger install base
Loco Translate runs on 1,000,000 active sites, more than triple Cyr-To-Lat's 300,000, which signals broader community trust and more real-world testing.
Higher user ratings
Loco Translate scores 96/100 across 450 ratings versus Cyr-To-Lat's 94/100 across 98 ratings, and the larger sample makes that edge more meaningful.
Higher overall quality score
Loco Translate's quality score of 88.77 beats Cyr-To-Lat's 86.13, driven by stronger popularity (90 vs 82) and ratings (96 vs 94) sub-scores.
Score-by-Score Comparison
Loco Translate leads on popularity with 90/30 versus Cyr-To-Lat's 82/30, reflecting its 1 million active installs compared to 300,000.
Both plugins tie at a perfect 100/25 for maintenance, and both were updated within the last couple of months of this comparison.
Loco Translate edges ahead at 96/15 versus 94/15 for Cyr-To-Lat, with both backed by dozens or hundreds of user reviews.
Cyr-To-Lat wins clearly on support with 88.9% resolution versus 50.0% for Loco Translate, though both earn only 50/15 because neither resolves more than 90% of threads.
Both plugins score a perfect 100/15 on compatibility, indicating no reported conflicts or environment issues at the time of review.
The Bottom Line
These plugins do not overlap in functionality, so the recommendation is straightforward: install Loco Translate if you translate plugins or themes, and install Cyr-To-Lat if your content uses non-Latin alphabets. Loco Translate carries the higher quality score (88.77 vs 86.13), larger install base (1M vs 300K), and stronger average rating (96 vs 94), making it the safer pick for the broader localization audience. Cyr-To-Lat's standout metric is its 88.9% support resolution rate, which matters if you run a multilingual content site and need reliable help when slug conversion misbehaves.